| Pages: [1] 2 3 |
1. WTS Estamel's Modified Invulnerability Field - in Sell Orders [original thread]
7.2
- by Prometheus Wrong - at 2008.02.16 11:43:00
|
2. WTS Estamel's Modified Invulnerability Field - in Sell Orders [original thread]
Edited by: Prometheus Wrong on 14/02/2008 03:48:35 will you take trades?
- by Prometheus Wrong - at 2008.02.14 03:46:00
|
3. WTS Estamel's Modified Invulnerability Field - in Sell Orders [original thread]
7
- by Prometheus Wrong - at 2008.02.13 20:48:00
|
4. WTS Estamel's Modified Invulnerability Field - in Sell Orders [original thread]
6.4
- by Prometheus Wrong - at 2008.02.13 06:46:00
|
5. Estamel's Modified Invulnerability Field - in Sell Orders [original thread]
6b
- by Prometheus Wrong - at 2008.02.06 21:05:00
|
6. I.HOP wardecs ASCN - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: Seleene Originally by: Grimpak who are you? Taste the Fantasy! <Long, loud belch> I know I feel defeated...or maybe that's just bloated...which I imagine feels something like defeated... <wanders...
- by Prometheus Wrong - at 2006.09.13 19:44:00
|
7. New BoB Outpost: 7BX-6F - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: Seleene Edited by: Seleene on 24/08/2006 08:05:10 Originally by: Prometheus Wrong Adv. sov, upgradable stations, planetary interaction and, yeah even degradable states ( /emote gives Seleene a dirty look ) promis...
- by Prometheus Wrong - at 2006.08.26 17:32:00
|
8. Dear Devs, are the Minmatar Carriers on your todo list at all? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Minny Carrier's bonus made me train Gallente BS 5. Even if its current bonus was useful (fleet lag fixed), who'd want to be primaried because of crap defense capabilities combined with the 'danger' you'd pose by being best at bosting the people ...
- by Prometheus Wrong - at 2006.08.25 23:22:00
|
9. New BoB Outpost: 7BX-6F - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
Edited by: Prometheus Wrong on 23/08/2006 18:23:40 Originally by: Roxanna Kell Edited by: Roxanna Kell on 21/08/2006 12:42:18 Originally by: Fortior Originally by: Alberta Originally by: Roxanna Kell since t...
- by Prometheus Wrong - at 2006.08.23 18:14:00
|
10. An Alternative to Assault Missiles - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Edited by: Prometheus Wrong on 29/07/2006 19:23:56 That would work too, but if you just change the way it uses lights, you don't have to introduce more missiles, and you also create the first weapon in eve that has a "charge rate" greater than...
- by Prometheus Wrong - at 2006.07.29 19:22:00
|
11. An Alternative to Assault Missiles - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
I've thought about this a fair ammount, and something that has always bothered me about the assault launcher is the fact that it makes any cruiser with them into what is essentially an anti-frigate pwnmobile. The cerberus, in particular, with assu...
- by Prometheus Wrong - at 2006.07.29 18:59:00
|
12. T2 Indy Bonus Still Broken? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: HippoKing You have pretty much totally just changed the thread Wouldn't have leaving this one and making a new one on the new topic, or just posting your new idea in a new post make more sense? Does asking this questio...
- by Prometheus Wrong - at 2006.07.24 20:52:00
|
13. Why not change what EW does? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
You wanted me to spell it all out for you? You want math? <grins> What if I did come up with a whole system? The Devs probably wouldn't use it. ;) I'm just trying to get across a general idea for a different direction to go with EW. More of ...
- by Prometheus Wrong - at 2006.07.24 20:31:00
|
14. My take on balancing of wcs and nos/neuts - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Rather than Nerf nos, just give us a counter mod that either negates or greatly reduces the Nossing effect.
- by Prometheus Wrong - at 2006.07.24 19:25:00
|
15. Why not change what EW does? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Edited by: Prometheus Wrong on 24/07/2006 19:16:16 Rather than make it something that renders a ship unable to target (which is just obnoxious, and overpowered), why not make Electronic Warfare something more comprehesive than simply blasting ...
- by Prometheus Wrong - at 2006.07.24 19:10:00
|
16. No Topic - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Edited by: Prometheus Wrong on 24/07/2006 19:10:06 Edited by: Prometheus Wrong on 24/07/2006 19:09:52
- by Prometheus Wrong - at 2006.07.24 19:06:00
|
17. Railcrow LOL - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
As the more inteligent people in this thread have already pointed out, it was a valid setup with one rail. Mr Fix didn't get all his snakies in in time, BoB probably did, and chose the better setup. Kudos to BoB and Twd. They fought well, they f...
- by Prometheus Wrong - at 2006.07.24 00:11:00
|
18. Nerf the Ever Loving Piss Out of Range. - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Masta Killa You bring at least 5x people's numbers every time you fight. 250:50 when fighting COL, RAT and SE. 25:5 when fighting Burn Eden. And of course extreme cases like 20 vs me back in ec-. You have absolutely zer...
- by Prometheus Wrong - at 2006.06.24 20:45:00
|
19. How to beat BoB? - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
The end is neigh when David Corbet posts the most lucid post in a thread, no matter how redundant the thread. 'reason nobody goes after BoB is that it would, initially, be demoralizing as hell, and then plain boring therafter. Besides: what's the...
- by Prometheus Wrong - at 2006.06.24 19:43:00
|
20. Re-designed ships. - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
If Asgeir keeps this up, the ammount of love he recieves from the community is going to unsettle the question as to wether or not a man can become pregnant.
- by Prometheus Wrong - at 2006.06.24 19:09:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |